Trains, Salvini is “proud” to restrict his right to strike

Let’s sort out the speeches made in the train strike and the injunction that yesterday forced the Trenitalia and Italo workers’ protest to halve at 3 p.m., without limiting the success of the initially 24-hour protest that reached support in all regions between 80% and 100%.

It’s the government To harm travelers because it does not invite companies that refuse to negotiate with unions on contract renewals and work shifts. It is not the rail transport unions, practically all the abbreviations active in the sector, and above all the workers who join them, who hurt travelers when they go on strike to demand the right to a salary protected from the pains of inflation or to defend themselves against hard labour.

He is the minister Transport and Infrastructure, Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini (Liga), to harm travelers because he did nothing in the 34 days preceding the authorization of the half-strike yesterday (it lasted 24 hours, it lasted until 3 p.m. due to an injunction), not the unions that called called for a strike to resume negotiations with Trenitalia or Italo and avoid a deterioration in services.

He hits It can also be a way to seek understanding between users and workers as well: the well-being of the former depends on the conditions in which the others work. Vice versa. Another speech should be made about ticket prices, starting with the high speed. A problem with the quality of infrastructures (Italy is a country on the move), fair wages and taxation of profits made by companies in excellent financial health. This is the cost of editing. Virtues are the prerogative of individuals, and costs burden the public and, above all, consumers. The same one that Salvini said, in the name of “Italy open to wonders,” yesterday that he was “proud” “that he was not left behind.” This is not true, because yesterday there were guaranteed slots and long-distance trains. His rhetoric should be reversed: At what price should citizens travel? Is it right for a family to pay nearly the average mortgage payment for a move? What is this government doing? And what did the others do? nothing. Everyone fell silent in front of the “free market”. And to “banner”.

If this The basic approach to understanding the political causes of planned strikes in transport over the summer period, i.e. when it is most painful (what, shall we say, should a strike be beneficial?), let us use it to counter an all-consuming tyranny. The phrase “I pay, I demand” in which a large part of Italian politics, starting with the liberal right, is acknowledged.

Maurizio Landini, CGIL’s secretary, emphasized that “the Tar has appealed because it was a dramatic mistake, we respected the laws”. The National Consumers Union defined Salvini’s intervention as “late and coercive”. The injunction law makes it mandatory to attempt reconciliation. Doing so a few hours after the strike, as Salvini did, “made the attempt more formal than substantive”. This has hurt consumers who have chosen not to travel. As well as those who, perhaps, did not pay attention to the flow of news, were stranded on the tracks. Salvini should have thought of her last month. Yesterday, the Ministry of Transport announced that the consolation is still small, as the tables between the railway transport companies and the trade unions will reopen today. As for the strike at tomorrow’s airports, at the time of writing this report, it has been confirmed. Eta Airlines alone has canceled 133 domestic and international flights.

a result: The government strongly opposed the right to strike provided for in the constitution. Haq has been under attack for years. Salvini was not the only minister to issue a will. There is a law that allows this. It will take a fight to change it.